By author HamanQuestion: What is the present state of the White community?
Citation to Stormfront
Answer: The existing type of White community is in a culturally
collapsed and politically impotent condition. And unlike any other
community, the representatives of its profile are discouraged from
expressing themselves within the legal system and popular culture. Question: Why does that matter?
Answer: The survival tools of the White race are in its culture. And when community and camaraderie are absent, so is influence. Question: How do we know that this has really happened?
Answer: The competitors and opponents of Whites now routinely target the
most ideal (weakest) areas within the existing type of White
community(ies), ethnically cleansing until there's White flight, and
then use those footholds as strongholds to continue the process.
And the existing type is barely existing, as it has so very many cultural props missing; especially its legal supports. Question: Are there others ways to be that the existing type of White community is obsolete?
Answer: You'll be able to observe all the following things when the
White community has missing cultural connections: It will give up its
living spaces to others; even Whites on the job with strong views about
race will treat other Whites with the same views disrespectfully; even
WNs will disparage the value of asserting their democratic (small d)
right to a community profile while all others are flexing theirs
(Chinese, Indians, gays), confusing this neglected value with a very
undemocratic system that's rendered them second class citizens. Question: What is the solution to this?
Answer: PLE (Pioneer Little Europe) supporters advocate raising up a new
model of the White community, within the existing type of White
community, and that will act like a concentration of kindling in a
fireplace to culturally terraform our people. Question: Are there any historical examples of this ever succeeding?
Answer: Yes, Irish Nationalists concentrated themselves in the Dublin
area between the 1890s and 1916; the British Union of Fascists &
National Socialists concentrated themselves in London's East End in the
early 1930s, the suffragettes used the exact same area during WW1; and
Germany's right and left both concentrated themselves in Munich during
the 1920s (eventually forming a synthesis). Each experienced enormous
success and worldwide recognition from the magnified effect caused by
concentrating. Question: There's PLE activity now throughout the world, but if someone moves to the Pacific Northwest isn't that running away?
Answer: Certainly not. PLE locations are determined by whatever location
an organizer actually springs up and make invitations. We are White
Nationalists and should feel free to relocate either permanently or
temporarily to any location WITHIN the existing type of White community
because it has an urgent need for our support; just as David Duke was
willing to travel even alone to countless cities and towns. Question: For what kinds of locations can we expect even pro-White people to initially oppose our intention to raise up PLEs?
Answer: Expect many well meaning "friends" not to grasp that our true
opponents are burning massive holes in the existing type of White
communities, easily displacing any Whites living in whatever areas they
target for their own communities, so initially we'll be verbally opposed
by those who will say: "Don't do this with the Whites clinging to the
city, you'll be overwhelmed," and "don't pick an area in that region, as
the people who go there will be running away," and "don't do this in
the Pacific Northwest because it's cold in the winter and offers fewer
The truth, however, is that the messages of concentrating the conscious,
of community and camaraderie, and of negotiation and militancy,
absolutely must be brought to all our people. And although some areas
are certainly more ideal than others, it's the availability of a
motivated local organizer that's going to decide a given PLE's location.
As that is the case, our opponents really don't know where this new
kind of social fire, partly visible and partly invisible, will break out
next. Question: Are there different types of PLEs?
Yes: To begin with, most WNs today are still physically isolated
individuals, even if they are on someone's mailing-list or the Internet.
This is a very important thing to notice, because politics actually
means COMMUNITY (from the ancient Greek concept of the polis or ethnic
community) and that connectedness in the real world is where power comes
EMERGENCY PLE: As such, it's recommended that WNs quickly form PLEs
wheneinver possible in their present neighborhoods, on the jobs, in the
military, in the hospital, schools, and even on the bus or in jail. In
fact, in an informal sense we say "A PLE exists wherever two are more
White Nationalists are gathered in this noble race's name."
IDEAL PLE TARGET AREAS: These are the places where there's enough space
and resources (ref. The PLE Prospectus for additional details about
ideal locations) to support all those who would actually relocate in
order to flex a much higher degree of influence.
PURIST PLEs?: Occasionally people who haven't read or understood the PLE
Prospectus will say that they would be interested if they can banish
the other Stormfronters who aren't into their particular pro-White spin
from the target area. That approach kept the movement divided and
powerless, so unseen provocateurs will certainly encourage that again
and again - and much worse from the safety of the Internet.
What goes on in an open PLE target area, however, is that the purist
organizations and individuals there will be free to exclude whoever they
want. But turning away other truly cooperative and supportive
Stormfronters from Stormfront or the PLE target area itself needs to be
viewed as highly suspicious, so be prepared instead to pitch your views
to any friendly strangers, the WNs conscious enough to travel a very
long way. Are PLEs ever completely located on any one person's property?
One of the greatest tactical errors of White Nationalism in the past -
which PLE addresses with enormous emphasis - is the sole ownership of
any alternative White community. This is because the illegal actions of
even one loose cannon participant or agent provocateur can cause that
owner to be solely liable in a legal sense for any damages occurring
The Reverend Butler's Aryan Nations compound in Idaho and Robert
Shelton's United Klans of America in Alabama, for example, were both
financially crushed due to exactly those circumstances.
As such, what's recommended is that we use instead the strategy of our
successful opponents and competitors, where there are so many owners of
property in the PLE target area that the criss-crossing of its many
individuals and groups becomes bewildering for any hostile observers to
track. Question: Is PLE about encouraging what's popularly known as "racism" or racial hatred?
Answer: If you're talking about us promoting the concept of race
detached from any sober concern for cultural values, where our race's
survival tools are, then no, that would merely be a spiritually empty
materialism. More accurately PLE is an ethnic approach to things, as in
race AND culture. Is PLE about publicly disrespecting people who are racially mixed?
There are all kinds of attitudes about racially mixed people throughout
the world, including a private view within many high cultures that
outsiders are merely chaff, but it's more modern and realistic to see
that racially mixed populations are still part of the world ecology. For
example, consider the long string of mixed nations which separate
Europe from the Orient: These provide a buffer or fence for the more
consistent esthetics and cultural types to stabilize themselves. On the
other hand, if a high culture simply conquers such areas and absorbs
their populations racially and culturally, it eventually experiences a
collapse. Question: Is PLE about encouraging violence?
If you examine the political/cultural/lifestyle communities of our
competitors and opponents, those who already flex enormous influence in
this country, what you'll notice is that they already employ the same
open community approach to organizing.
Then it becomes a matter of common sense what will happen: If such open
communities are attacked in a manner that their residents consider
immoral, unfair, or illegal, the militants experience a rise in sympathy
and support, but when the residents are permitted to peacefully
increase their influence and civil rights, it's quiet and business
continues normally. This is the PLE projection as well. Question:
If that's the case, then why do the PLE supporters direct these so
called "racist materialists" into the PLE's target area?
As the cultural integrity of the existing type of White community
continues to collapse, for the reasons I've already given, there's a
corresponding rise in the number of casualties who've developed a feral
state of mind. Look on the school campuses, for example, where gangs
proliferate and only White students are told that their ethnic
community's identity is evil. Many of the White students react by
becoming quite threatening themselves.
Should anyone really be surprised if a growing percentage declare
themselves to be militants, haters, or cultists when they alone are not
accommodated as a real community?
So no, just as the Zionists raising up Israel didn't turn away any feral
minded supporters - those who had experienced their own vulnerability
while having no stable living space during WW2 - we can't afford that
either. And a PLE's culture revival will guide every one of the
casualties among our people onto the road to recovery.
Another way to explain this is to have someone imagine what happens
whenever a common house cat is abandoned in the woods. It learns to
distrust people and becomes hard just to survive. Question: Are Jews invited to live in PLE target areas?
No, for just as America's non-White communities don't invite Whites to
actually move in among them, a PLE extends invitations only to its own
people (conscious Whites). Despite this, because PLEs are otherwise open
communities on the streets of America (where the purists groups within
them can exclude anyone they deem necessary), there will be nothing to
prevent any pro-White group or individual from having or not having
contacts or occasional visits from any race; whether for legal
assistance, political alliances, or profitable business in the shops.
If you're finding this difficult to visualize, then consider for a
moment how Chinese communities operate. No one invades them, outsiders
are free to do business with them, and they function as a foothold in
America for all Chinese business and culture. Chinatowns are also
spreading rapidly, as they are a successful form of exclusion unlike the
close-proximity segregation system which once ruled the South. Question: Will a PLE's residents actually chase out the people who dislike their presence?
Answer: That would be a violation of the federal civil rights laws, so
no, that's not what's being advocated here. Instead, PLE residents are
urged to quickly raise up an "Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture"
for their opponents to voluntarily avoid. This is how it's done by any
ethnic group on the rise in this country, whether it's the Chinese
hanging up dried chickens in the windows or the Gays holding highly
visible parades and street parties. Question: You've said
that these PLEs (Pioneer Little Europes or proposed Stormfronts of the
street) will be open to all pro-White spins, groups, and individuals,
and you don't require anyone to follow even the recommended spin, but
for anyone interested what is it?
Answer: It's populism, America's own somewhat more democratic national
socialism, the tradition that served Long, Coughlin, Lindbergh,
Townsend, Duke (and to some degree even Roosevelt).
Question: Due to their feral state of mind - given the enormous cultural
collapse of the existing type of White community - a certain fraction
of PLE supporters are still going to want to promote a foreign militant
creed instead of taking up this native populism you're talking about, so
what are the advantages to it?
Answer: Our own populism, as a somewhat more democratic and evolved
example of the worldwide national socialisms of the last century, offers
an aspect that permits a kind of "temporary legionism" to be brought
right into politics without violating the US Constitution - if and when
necessary at all. Question: Could you list a few Americans who have resorted to this temporary militancy in politics?
Answer: Yes, Abraham Lincoln, Jefferson Davis, Nathan B. Forrest, Huey
Long, Franklin Roosevelt. And a postwar incident which occurred in
Athens, Tennessee in August of 1946 offers an extreme example though on a
local basis (see Wikipedia). Question: How would this
temporary militancy, which you say is permitted by the Constitution of
the United States (though rarely discussed in the media for fear of it),
be employed today?
Answer: You know and I know that we're morally entitled to White
communities that aren't being targeted for ethnic cleansing, so we may
have to occasionally stand up for that right and take our chances in
What's recommended in the PLE prospectus is a common front of veteran
legionnaires, whatever their more personal political spins (some of
which are can be quite colorful), who would operate out of visible and
invisible posts associated with the local PLE area.
And that shouldn't be dismissed as an experiment, because our
competitors and opponents are already availing themselves of such LOCAL
posts WITHIN their own political/cultural/lifestyle communities
(strongholds). You've mentioned the Jewish question, but
how does this native populism handle the really controversial topic of
Adolf Hitler? And I'm obviously asking this because so many people think
there's some kind of association to you.
Answer: A modern development of our populism is that the PLE supporters
will lay claim to all of White history, worldwide, but then we'll
support free speech, including positive criticism, whether it's about
Hitler, Stalin, Roosevelt or anyone else.
That will be a hard pill for any cultists to swallow, some of whom will
be within the PLE target area, because they must either learn to trust
other White Nationalists to eventually sort it out in the interest of
solidarity and community - or the cultists must persuade their critics
within the target area to adopt their particular spin.